高级检索

双层结构底板塑性滑移破坏机理及应用研究

Research on the plastic slip failure mechanism and application of double-layer floor structure

  • 摘要: 煤层底板采动破坏特征受岩性组合结构的影响较为显著。针对由力学性质迥异的上、下两层岩体构成的广泛赋存于华北型煤田的典型双层结构底板,传统单一岩层模型难以准确表征其破坏特征,因此揭示复杂底板岩层结构破坏机理极为关键。本文将埋深及采高等开采因素引入塑性滑移破坏理论,揭示了开采条件对复杂结构底板塑性滑移破坏深度及形态的影响机理,并结合算例量化了岩层结构对底板破坏深度的制约作用。建立了考虑采空区岩体垮落压实过程对底板应力环境调整作用的数值模型,明确了底板破坏形态主要为剪切破坏,底板应力调整过程不改变底板破坏形态;明确了不同赋存类型底板的采动破坏特征,掌握了岩性及厚度对底板破坏的影响规律,得到了底板采动破坏主要取决于软岩的层位及厚度。最后,对比现场实测得到的底板破坏深度,理论分析、数值模拟计算结果相对误差分别为-6.8%、6.9%,验证了模型的科学性和可靠性。研究成果可为近距离煤层、承压水上煤层安全开采等所涉及的底板稳定性控制及风险防控工作提供理论支撑。

     

    Abstract: The failure characteristics of the coal seam floor under mining are significantly influenced by the lithologic combination and structural arrangement of the underlying strata. For the typical double-layer floor structure, composed of upper and lower rock layers with significantly different mechanical properties, commonly found in the North China-type coalfields, traditional single-layer floor structure to accurately characterize the failure characteristics. Therefore, it is crucial to reveal the failure mechanism of complex bedrock layer structures. In this study, mining factors such as burial depth and mining height are incorporated into a plastic slip failure framework to explain how mining conditions control the depth and geometry of plastic slip failure in structurally complex floors. Representative cases are further used to quantify the extent to which the stratigraphic structure constrains the floor failure depth. A numerical model is developed to account for the stress environment adjustment induced by goaf caving and compaction. The results show that floor failure is dominated by shear, and that the stress adjustment during goaf compaction does not alter the failure mode. The failure characteristics of the coal seam floor under mining for different bedrock types have been clarified. The influence of lithology and thickness on floor failure has been systematically understood, revealing that the primary factor determining floor failure is the position and thickness of soft rock layers. By comparison with field measurements of floor failure depth, the relative errors of the theoretical analysis and numerical simulations are -6.8% and 6.9%, respectively, supporting the scientific validity and reliability of the proposed approach. These findings provide a theoretical basis for floor stability control and risk mitigation in scenarios such as close-distance coal seams and the safe extraction of seams overlying confined aquifers.

     

/

返回文章
返回