高级检索

岩石拉压双模量特性对巴西劈裂抗拉强度的影响及计算方法改进

Influence of bi-modulus property of rock on tensile strength evaluation in the Brazilian test and its calculation improvement

  • 摘要: 岩石材料普遍具有拉压双模量特性, 该特性对巴西劈裂试验中抗拉强度的测定具有重要影响, 但在传统分析中常被忽视。为系统揭示拉压双模量特性对巴西圆盘弹性模量与应力分布的影响, 构建了一种应力驱动的拉压双模量数值模型, 开展了不同压拉模量比条件下的巴西圆盘力学行为研究, 对比了横观各向同性模型与拉压双模量模型的计算差异, 分析了拉压双模量特性对抗拉强度的影响, 并提出了一种新的抗拉强度计算公式。研究结果表明: ①拉压双模量特性显著影响巴西圆盘的弹性模量和应力分布, 特别是在压拉模量比值较大情况下; ②横观各向同性模型与拉压双模量模型在竖直方向的应力和应变计算结果具有良好一致性, 但在水平方向存在较大差异; ③基于各向同性假设的传统抗拉强度计算公式将高估岩石强度, 计算误差随着压拉模量比值的增加而增大, 最高可达54.95%; ④提出的应力计算公式可准确描述巴西圆盘中心的水平应力状态, 计算误差均小于5%, 有效避免了因忽略拉压模量差异而导致的强度评估误差, 为岩石抗拉强度的测定提供了可靠方法。

     

    Abstract: Rock materials commonly exhibit tension-compression bi-modulus behavior, which has a crucial influence on the determination of tensile strength in the Brazilian test but is often neglected in traditional analyses. To systematically investigate the effects of this property on the elastic modulus and stress distribution in Brazilian discs, a stress-driven bi-modulus numerical model is developed. The mechanical behavior of the Brazilian disc under different compression-to-tension modulus ratios is studied, and the calculation differences between the transversely isotropic model and the bi-modulus model are compared. The influence of tension-compression bi-modulus characteristics on tensile strength is analyzed, and a new calculation formula is proposed. The results indicate that: (1) Tension-compression bi-modulus characteristics significantly affect the elastic modulus and stress distribution in the Brazilian disc, especially under high compression-to-tension modulus ratios; (2) The stress and strain calculation results in the vertical direction are consistent between the transversely isotropic model and bi-modulus model, but there are significant differences in the horizontal direction; (3) The traditional tensile strength calculation formula based on isotropic assumptions overestimates rock strength, with the relative error increasing as the compression-to-tension modulus ratio increases, reaching up to 54.95%; (4) The proposed formula accurately describes the horizontal stress at the disc center, with relative errors below 5%. It effectively mitigates strength estimation errors caused by neglecting the difference between tensile and compressive moduli, thereby providing a reliable method for determining the tensile strength of bi-modulus rocks.

     

/

返回文章
返回